When Love Turns Lethal: The Disappearance of Gracie Nell Nash
In the winter of 1983, the streets of Austin, Texas, were about to become the stage for a terrifying drama that would unfold over ten months and leave multiple families shattered. What began as a simple breakup between Melvin Davis and his girlfriend Naomi Easley would spiral into a campaign of violence so systematic and brutal that it reads like the plot of a psychological thriller. At the center of this nightmare was 39-year-old Gracie Nell Nash, a hardworking nursing home employee whose only crime was being related to the wrong man.
Gracie's disappearance on December 26, 1983, was not an isolated incident but rather the culmination of months of escalating terror that had gripped the Davis family. Her story serves as a chilling reminder of how domestic violence can extend far beyond the primary relationship, ensnaring innocent family members in its deadly web. More than four decades later, Gracie remains missing, her fate known only to those responsible for her disappearance.
A Life of Service and Family
Gracie Nell Nash was born on April 3, 1944, into a large African American family that would eventually number seventeen children. The fourth of these children, Gracie grew up understanding the importance of hard work, family loyalty, and community service. These values would define her throughout her life and ultimately make her a target in someone else's vendetta.
Standing 5 feet 5 inches tall and weighing 112 pounds, Gracie was a petite woman with brown hair, black eyes, and a warm smile that endeared her to patients and colleagues alike. She wore full dentures, a detail that would later become important for identification purposes, and carried herself with the quiet dignity that came from years of caring for others.
Like many women of her generation, Gracie had married young and had two children before eventually divorcing. While the details of her marriage and divorce remain private, those who knew her described her as someone who handled life's challenges with grace and determination. She never remarried, instead focusing her energy on her work and maintaining close relationships with her large extended family.
By 1983, Gracie had been working at the Eastfair Nursing Home on East Martin Luther King Boulevard in Austin for nearly a decade. Located at 2820 East Martin Luther King Boulevard, the facility served as a crucial resource for elderly residents who needed specialized care. Gracie's role there was more than just a job; it was a calling that allowed her to provide comfort and dignity to people in their most vulnerable moments.
Her supervisor at the nursing home later described her as an exemplary employee who was reliable, compassionate, and beloved by both residents and staff. She worked the evening shift, typically finishing her duties at 11:00 PM before making the drive home to Manor, Texas, where she lived with her parents and two younger siblings. This routine had become second nature to her, and she was known for her punctuality and dedication.
According to those who knew her best, Gracie was not someone who frequented bars or used drugs. She lived a quiet, respectable life centered around work and family. She did have a steady boyfriend at the time of her disappearance, but her family has never believed he was involved in her case. By all accounts, Gracie was simply a woman trying to live a peaceful life while caring for others and supporting her family.
The Davis Family Under Siege
To understand what happened to Gracie, one must first understand the reign of terror that had been unleashed upon her family months before her disappearance. The trouble began in May 1983, when her brother Melvin Douglas Davis, known to family and friends as "Butch," made the decision to end his relationship with his girlfriend, Naomi Easley.
Melvin lived with his older brother, John Henry Davis Jr., in a house at 7600 Blessing Avenue. The two brothers had shared this residence for fifteen years, creating a stable home base that served as a gathering place for their large extended family. John was involved in racing and kept his race car and trailer at the property, while Melvin worked steadily and maintained what appeared to be a normal, productive life.
The breakup with Naomi Easley should have been the end of a chapter for Melvin, but instead it marked the beginning of a nightmare that would consume his entire family. Easley's reaction to the end of their relationship was swift and vicious, revealing a capacity for violence and obsession that would prove deadly.
Almost immediately after the breakup, Easley began a systematic campaign to destroy Melvin's life and terrorize his family. She wrote letters to his employer attempting to get him fired, demonstrating a calculated approach to causing maximum damage to his livelihood. When that failed to achieve her desired result, she escalated to more direct forms of harassment and intimidation.
The Davis brothers soon discovered that their home had been burglarized, with personal belongings destroyed and damaged. Someone slashed the tires on John's race car and the trailer he used to transport it, causing hundreds of dollars in damage and interfering with his hobby and potential source of income. The brothers began to suspect Easley, but the attacks were just beginning.
Melvin caught Easley in the act of pouring sugar and syrup into his gas tank, a form of sabotage that could have caused expensive damage to his vehicle and left him stranded. When confronted, she didn't deny her actions or show remorse, instead seeming to take pleasure in the chaos she was creating. The incident marked a turning point where the harassment became more brazen and dangerous.
Escalating Violence
As the summer of 1983 progressed, Easley's behavior became increasingly violent and unpredictable. During one confrontation at Melvin's house, she pulled a gun on him, a escalation that could have easily resulted in his death. Melvin managed to disarm her, taking the weapon away, but rather than fleeing or showing fear, Easley ran from the house only to return shortly afterward asking for the gun back.
This incident demonstrated not only her access to weapons but also her willingness to use them against Melvin. It also revealed a disturbing pattern of behavior where she seemed unable to accept that their relationship was over and that she no longer had any claim to his time, attention, or possessions.
The police were eventually called to respond to one of Easley's threats, and they confiscated both a gun and a butcher knife from her possession. The discovery of multiple weapons suggested that she had been planning and preparing for more serious violence. Authorities placed her under a peace bond, a legal instrument designed to prevent her from continuing to threaten or harass Melvin and his family.
However, the peace bond proved to be little more than a piece of paper. Easley continued her campaign of terror, undeterred by legal consequences or the potential for arrest. The attacks on the Davis property continued, with their garage being set on fire in a case of suspected arson that destroyed John's car. The fire represented a significant escalation, as it put not only property at risk but also the safety of anyone who might have been in or near the building.
Throughout this period, family members noticed that Easley seemed to be targeting not just Melvin but anyone connected to him. Her rage appeared to have expanded beyond the failed relationship to encompass his entire support system, making every member of the Davis family a potential target for her violence.
The Shooting
On November 18, 1983, the violence reached a new and terrifying peak when Easley shot Melvin. The details of the shooting revealed the calculated nature of her assault and her clear intent to cause serious harm or death. She shot him in the wrist, an injury that, while not fatal, served as a clear message about her willingness to use deadly force.
The shooting occurred in circumstances that suggested premeditation rather than a crime of passion. Easley had to obtain a weapon, position herself to have a clear shot at Melvin, and make the conscious decision to pull the trigger. The fact that she hit him in the wrist might have been intentional, designed to cause pain and disability without necessarily killing him immediately.
Following the shooting, Easley was arrested and charged with aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, a serious felony that carried the potential for significant prison time. However, she was able to post bail and was released pending trial, a decision that would prove to have devastating consequences for the Davis family.
Her release on bail meant that she was free to continue her campaign of terror while facing charges for shooting Melvin. This situation created a perfect storm where someone who had already demonstrated a willingness to use deadly force was allowed to remain at liberty while angry about facing legal consequences for her actions.
Just three days after being bailed out, someone fired several shots at John Henry Davis Jr. as he was leaving his house to go to work at dawn on November 21, 1983. The shots missed their target, but the message was clear: the violence was escalating and no member of the Davis family was safe.
The Day After Christmas
On December 26, 1983, as Austin residents were settling back into their routines after Christmas celebrations, Gracie Nash prepared for what would be her final shift at the Eastfair Nursing Home. It was a bitterly cold day with ice on the roads, creating hazardous driving conditions that prompted one of Gracie's sisters to suggest she leave work early. Gracie, ever dedicated to her job and her patients, declined the suggestion and worked her full shift.
At 11:00 PM, Gracie finished her duties and prepared to leave for home. She was wearing her white nurse's uniform and a gray coat with a large fur collar, clothing that would later become crucial for identification purposes. She said goodbye to her colleagues and walked out to the parking lot where her car was parked.
What happened next can only be pieced together from the evidence that was later discovered. Gracie never made it home to Manor, Texas, where her parents and siblings were waiting for her. She never called to explain a delay or change in plans. She simply vanished from the parking lot of the nursing home where she had worked faithfully for nearly ten years.
The next morning, when Gracie failed to arrive home or report for her next shift, her family knew something was terribly wrong. This was not a woman who disappeared without explanation or who would leave her family worried about her safety. Her reliability and dedication to both work and family meant that her absence was immediately cause for alarm.
A search of the nursing home parking lot revealed her necklace lying on the ground, a small but significant piece of evidence that suggested she had not left voluntarily. The necklace could have been torn off during a struggle or dropped as she was being forced from the area. Either way, its presence indicated that something violent had occurred in the place where Gracie should have been safe.
The Terrifying Phone Call
The morning after Gracie's disappearance, her mother received a phone call that confirmed the family's worst fears and linked her disappearance directly to the ongoing violence against the Davis family. An unknown caller with a muffled voice delivered a chilling message: "If you want to see your daughter alive again, tell your son to drop charges against the woman."
The reference to "the woman" was clearly directed at Naomi Easley and the pending assault case for shooting Melvin. The timing of the call, coming just hours after Gracie's disappearance, left no doubt that her vanishing was connected to Easley's campaign of violence against the family.
The phone call revealed several disturbing aspects of the crime. First, it demonstrated that Gracie's disappearance was not random but was specifically orchestrated to put pressure on Melvin to drop the charges against Easley. Second, it suggested that at the time of the call, Gracie might still have been alive, held somewhere against her will as leverage in Easley's war against the family.
The demand that Melvin drop the charges created an impossible situation for the family. Complying with the caller's demands might save Gracie's life, but it would also ensure that Easley faced no consequences for shooting Melvin and would be free to continue her campaign of violence. Refusing to comply might result in Gracie's death, but pursuing justice for Melvin's shooting was also important for protecting the family from future attacks.
The caller's use of a muffled voice suggested an attempt to disguise their identity, though the content and timing of the call made it clear who was behind Gracie's disappearance. The fact that someone felt the need to disguise their voice also indicated an awareness that they were committing a serious crime and could be identified and prosecuted if caught.
The Bloody Discovery
Two days after Gracie's disappearance, on December 28, 1983, her white and green 1971 Chevrolet bearing Texas license plates PPT621 was found abandoned in the 2400 block of East 22nd Street near Maple. The location of the abandoned vehicle, several miles from the nursing home, suggested that whoever took Gracie had driven her car to that location before abandoning it.
When police examined the vehicle, they discovered a scene that left little doubt about Gracie's fate. The car contained what investigators described as signs of a "very violent assault," including large amounts of dried blood. The volume of blood was so significant that authorities stated it appeared someone had been shot, and that whoever had lost that much blood could not have survived their injuries.
Gracie's gray coat with the large fur collar was found inside the vehicle, suggesting that she had been wearing it when the attack occurred and that it had been removed from her body, either before or after she was killed. The presence of the coat inside the car, rather than on Gracie's body, indicated that she had been taken from the vehicle at some point.
The condition of the car's interior told a story of desperate struggle and brutal violence. The blood evidence suggested that Gracie had fought for her life, but had been overpowered by her attacker or attackers. The amount of blood present made it clear to investigators that this was not a case of kidnapping where the victim might still be alive somewhere.
The location where the car was abandoned appeared to have been chosen deliberately, in an area that was not immediately visible from major roads but was accessible enough for the perpetrator to leave the vehicle and escape on foot or in another car. The choice of location suggested some familiarity with the area and a degree of planning in the execution of the crime.
The Final Murder
Six weeks after Gracie's disappearance, on the morning of February 3, 1984, the violence that had been stalking the Davis family claimed another victim. John Henry Davis Jr., who had already survived one shooting attempt, was walking to his car to go to work when he was shot and killed outside his home.
The murder of John occurred at dawn, suggesting that the killer was familiar with his routine and had been waiting for the right opportunity to strike. The timing and location of the attack indicated premeditation and careful planning, rather than a spontaneous act of violence.
John's death represented the culmination of the terror campaign that had been waged against the Davis family for nearly ten months. He had done nothing to provoke the violence other than being related to Melvin and living in the same house. His murder served no purpose other than to inflict maximum pain on the family and to demonstrate the killer's complete disregard for human life.
The loss of John, coming so soon after Gracie's disappearance, devastated the Davis family and left them living in fear of who might be next. The systematic nature of the attacks suggested that the violence might continue until every member of the family was dead or until the perpetrator was stopped by law enforcement.
With Gracie missing and presumed dead and John murdered, the Davis family had lost two members to violence in the span of six weeks. The attacks appeared to be specifically targeting family members rather than being random acts of violence, creating a pattern that pointed clearly to someone with a personal vendetta against the family.
The Legal System Fails
Despite the clear pattern of escalating violence and the obvious connection between Easley's harassment of the Davis family and the disappearance of Gracie and murder of John, the legal system seemed unable or unwilling to hold her accountable for the full scope of her crimes.
When Easley finally went to trial for shooting Melvin, the jury was not allowed to hear about the murders of John and Gracie, severely limiting their ability to understand the context and seriousness of her violent behavior. This legal restriction meant that the jury saw only a single incident of domestic violence rather than a pattern of escalating terror that had claimed multiple lives.
The jury's deliberations revealed the impact of this limited information. Nine jurors wanted to convict Easley, but they were split on the charges: three wanted to convict her of attempted murder, while six opted for the lesser charge of aggravated assault. Three jurors voted for acquittal, with at least one expressing doubt about whether Melvin could clearly see Easley in the dim light at the time of the shooting.
One juror's reasoning for acquittal was particularly troubling, as they apparently believed that Melvin might have been "going out on" Easley, suggesting that infidelity could somehow justify her shooting him. This reasoning ignored the fact that even if Melvin had been unfaithful, it would not legally justify Easley's use of deadly force against him.
The inability of the jury to reach a unanimous verdict resulted in a mistrial, which should have led to a retrial on the same charges. Instead, Easley was allowed to plead no contest to aggravated assault and received ten years' probation. This sentence meant that despite shooting someone and being connected to two other violent crimes, she received no jail time and was free to continue her life with minimal supervision.
The lenient sentence sent a dangerous message that violence against the Davis family would not be taken seriously by the criminal justice system. It also left Easley free to continue her pattern of violence, which she would do with deadly consequences in the years to come.
The Pattern Continues
Naomi Easley's light sentence for shooting Melvin Davis did nothing to curb her violent tendencies. In 1986, she married Kent Moore, apparently moving on with her life while the Davis family continued to grieve their losses and live in fear of future attacks.
The marriage to Moore might have seemed like a new beginning, but it soon became clear that Easley's capacity for violence had not diminished. The couple's relationship was reportedly troubled from the beginning, with signs that Easley's controlling and violent behavior was being directed toward her new husband.
By 1989, Easley and Moore were in the process of getting a divorce, a situation that apparently triggered the same violent response that had characterized her reaction to the breakup with Melvin Davis. On November 6, 1989, Easley shot her estranged husband five times at his home at 5504 Manor Road in Austin.
The attack on Moore was particularly brutal, with shots to the head and chest that were clearly intended to kill. Moore managed to identify Easley as his attacker before dying at the hospital, providing crucial evidence that would finally lead to her conviction for murder.
The murder of Kent Moore demonstrated that the violence against the Davis family was not an isolated incident but part of a broader pattern of behavior that characterized Easley's response to rejection and loss of control. Her willingness to kill anyone who tried to leave her or who stood in her way revealed a level of dangerous pathology that should have been recognized and addressed years earlier.
During the murder trial for Kent Moore's death, Melvin Davis testified against his former girlfriend, providing crucial testimony about her pattern of violence and the terror she had inflicted on his family. The prosecution described Easley as "extremely dangerous," a characterization that was supported by the evidence of her decade-long campaign of violence.
Justice Delayed
Unlike the earlier case involving the shooting of Melvin Davis, the trial for Kent Moore's murder resulted in a swift and decisive conviction. The jury found Easley guilty of murder and sentenced her to 75 years in prison, finally putting an end to her ability to terrorize and kill others.
The 75-year sentence reflected the seriousness of the crime and the danger that Easley posed to the community. At the time of her sentencing, she would have been in her forties, meaning that the sentence was effectively a life term that would keep her incarcerated until she was elderly or until her death.
The conviction provided some measure of justice for Kent Moore's family and vindicated Melvin Davis's years of insisting that Easley was responsible for the violence against his family. However, it came too late to save Gracie Nash and John Henry Davis Jr., whose deaths could have been prevented if the justice system had taken Easley's earlier violence more seriously.
During her appeals process, details emerged about Easley's manipulative behavior and her attempts to evade responsibility for her crimes. Court documents revealed that she had tried to persuade a pastor to provide false testimony on her behalf, claiming she was with him at the time of her husband's murder.
When the pastor refused to lie for her, Easley reportedly wrote threatening letters attempting to blackmail him into compliance. The letters demonstrated her continued willingness to manipulate and threaten others to avoid consequences for her actions, showing that even while facing murder charges, she had not changed her fundamental approach to dealing with problems.
The Cold Case Legacy
Despite the clear connection between Naomi Easley and the disappearance of Gracie Nash and the murder of John Henry Davis Jr., she has never been formally charged with these crimes. The cases remain officially unsolved, though most observers believe that Easley was responsible for both deaths.
The failure to charge Easley with these additional murders appears to be primarily due to lack of physical evidence and witnesses rather than lack of suspicion. While the circumstantial evidence strongly suggests her involvement, proving her guilt beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law would require evidence that may no longer exist or may never have been properly collected.
Gracie's body has never been found, despite searches of areas where Easley might have disposed of it. The passage of time has made it increasingly unlikely that her remains will ever be recovered, denying her family the closure that would come with being able to lay her to rest properly.
The location of Gracie's body remains one of the most frustrating aspects of the case for investigators and family members. Easley has never provided any information about what she did with Gracie's remains, taking that secret with her into prison where she continues to serve her sentence for Kent Moore's murder.
As of recent reports, Easley has been repeatedly denied parole, with authorities citing her continued danger to public safety. Her most recent parole denial occurred in November 2019, indicating that even after decades in prison, she is still considered too dangerous to release back into the community.
A Family's Ongoing Pain
For the surviving members of the Davis family, the lack of resolution in Gracie's case and John's murder represents an ongoing source of pain and frustration. They have lived for more than four decades knowing who they believe killed their loved ones but being unable to see justice served for those specific crimes.
The family's tragedy was compounded by what appears to have been indifference or inability on the part of law enforcement to recognize the seriousness of Easley's threat. The systematic nature of her attacks on the family should have triggered more aggressive intervention, but instead, the violence was allowed to escalate until it claimed multiple lives.
Gracie's surviving relatives have had to live with the knowledge that she died simply because she was related to someone who had chosen to end a relationship with a violent and unstable person. Her death served no purpose other than to cause pain to her family and to satisfy Easley's desire for revenge against Melvin.
The fact that Gracie's body was never recovered has made the grieving process particularly difficult for her family. Without being able to hold a proper funeral or visit a grave site, they have been denied the traditional rituals that help families process loss and find closure.
The case has also highlighted the particular vulnerability of working women like Gracie, who finished their shifts late at night and had to travel home alone. Her disappearance from the nursing home parking lot serves as a reminder of the dangers that healthcare workers and other essential employees face when working evening and overnight shifts.
Unanswered Questions
More than four decades after Gracie's disappearance, many questions about her case remain unanswered. While there is strong circumstantial evidence pointing to Naomi Easley's involvement, the exact details of what happened to Gracie and where her body is located remain unknown.
The question of whether Easley acted alone or had help in carrying out the attacks against the Davis family has never been definitively answered. The scope and coordination of the violence suggests that she might have had assistance, but no accomplices have ever been identified or charged.
The timing and execution of the attacks suggest a level of planning and surveillance that might have been difficult for one person to accomplish alone. The fact that John Henry Davis Jr. was shot as he left for work at dawn suggests that someone was watching his routine and waiting for the right opportunity to strike.
The location where Gracie's body was disposed of remains one of the most significant unanswered questions in the case. Easley would have needed a place to take Gracie after killing her, and the location would need to be secluded enough to avoid detection but accessible enough for her to reach with a body.
The question of whether Gracie was killed immediately after being taken from the nursing home parking lot or whether she was held captive for some time before being killed is another mystery that may never be solved. The threatening phone call received by her mother the next day suggests she might have been alive at that point, but the amount of blood in her car suggests she was severely injured from the beginning.
The Broader Impact
Gracie's case serves as a stark example of how domestic violence can extend far beyond the primary relationship to endanger family members, friends, and anyone else connected to the target of the abuser's rage. Her story demonstrates the need for law enforcement and the justice system to take threats and violence seriously, even when they appear to be "just" domestic disputes.
The failure of the legal system to adequately respond to Easley's escalating violence represents a systemic problem that continues to endanger victims of domestic violence today. The pattern of minimizing threats, granting lenient sentences, and failing to recognize the broader danger posed by violent individuals has been repeated in countless cases across the country.
Gracie's case also highlights the particular vulnerability of African American women and families, who often face additional barriers to receiving adequate protection and justice from law enforcement. The Davis family's working-class background and status as children of sharecroppers may have contributed to the lack of serious attention their case received from authorities.
The media coverage of Gracie's case was minimal compared to what might have been expected if she had been a white woman from a more affluent family. This disparity in attention and resources reflects broader patterns of inequality in how missing persons cases are handled and publicized.
The case has since been highlighted by organizations focused on bringing attention to missing and murdered Black women, who are often overlooked in mainstream media coverage of crime. These organizations work to ensure that cases like Gracie's are not forgotten and that families continue to receive support in their search for answers.
A Life Remembered
While Gracie's disappearance and presumed murder represent a tragic end to her life, it's important to remember the woman she was before she became a victim of someone else's violence. She was a dedicated healthcare worker who spent nearly a decade caring for elderly residents at the nursing home where she worked.
Her colleagues remembered her as someone who truly cared about her patients and who approached her work with compassion and professionalism. In an often demanding and emotionally difficult job, Gracie stood out for her reliability and her ability to provide comfort to people in their most vulnerable moments.
Gracie was also a devoted family member who maintained close relationships with her parents and siblings despite the challenges of being part of such a large family. Her decision to live with her parents and younger siblings while working full-time demonstrated her commitment to supporting her family financially and emotionally.
Her life, though cut short, had meaning and impact that extended far beyond her role as a victim of violence. The patients she cared for, the family members she supported, and the colleagues who worked alongside her all benefited from her presence in their lives.
The fact that Gracie has been missing for more than four decades does not diminish her value as a human being or the significance of her life. She deserves to be remembered not just as a victim but as a woman who lived with purpose and who contributed positively to her community.
The Search for Justice Continues
Although Naomi Easley has never been charged with Gracie's disappearance or John's murder, the cases technically remain open investigations. The Austin Police Department continues to list both cases as unsolved, though active investigation appears to be minimal given the passage of time and the likely perpetrator's continued incarceration.
Any new evidence that might emerge, such as information about the location of Gracie's body or witness testimony that had previously been unavailable, could potentially lead to charges being filed against Easley. However, the practical challenges of building a prosecutable case after so many years make this scenario unlikely.
The statute of limitations does not apply to murder cases, so there is no legal barrier to charging Easley with Gracie's death if sufficient evidence were to emerge. However, the evidentiary standards for criminal prosecution are high, and the circumstantial evidence that currently exists might not be sufficient to secure a conviction.
For Gracie's family and advocates, the lack of formal charges represents an ongoing injustice that compounds the tragedy of her death. While most people familiar with the case believe Easley was responsible, the absence of legal accountability means that Gracie's case remains officially unsolved.
The possibility that Easley might eventually be released from prison, though unlikely given her age and sentence length, adds urgency to the desire for resolution in Gracie's case. If she were ever to be paroled, the opportunity to question her about Gracie's disappearance might be lost forever.
A Lasting Legacy
More than four decades after her disappearance, Gracie Nell Nash remains a symbol of the countless women whose lives have been lost to domestic violence and whose cases have been inadequately investigated or prosecuted. Her story serves as a reminder of the need for systemic changes in how law enforcement and the justice system respond to threats and violence.
The case highlights the importance of taking early warning signs seriously and responding aggressively to patterns of escalating violence before they result in tragedy. The multiple incidents of harassment, threats, and violence that preceded Gracie's disappearance should have triggered more intensive intervention and supervision of Easley.
Gracie's case also demonstrates the need for better support systems for families affected by domestic violence, including resources for family members who may be at risk even if they are not directly involved in the abusive relationship. The Davis family's experience shows how violence can spread to engulf an entire family network.
The ongoing efforts to bring attention to missing and murdered Black women have helped ensure that Gracie's case is not forgotten. Organizations and advocates continue to share her story and push for renewed attention to cold cases involving women of color.
For anyone who knew Gracie or who has learned about her case through media coverage or advocacy efforts, her story serves as a reminder of the preciousness of life and the importance of supporting victims of violence. While her life was cut short, her memory continues to inspire efforts to protect other women from similar fates.
The search for answers in Gracie's case may continue for years to come, but her legacy is already established. She will be remembered as a caring nurse, a devoted family member, and a victim whose case highlights the need for justice and systemic change. Until her body is found and those responsible are held accountable, the search for truth and justice in her case will continue, ensuring that Gracie Nell Nash is never forgotten.
Sources
- The Charley Project - Gracie Nell Nash
- The Doe Network - Gracie Nash
- Our Black Girls - Gracie Nash Disappeared In 1983 Weeks Before Her Brother's Murder
- The Charley Project Blog - Flashback Friday: Gracie Nash
- The Charley Project Blog - Naomi Easley Moore
- Justia Law - Naomi Easley v. The State of Texas
- Leagle - EASLEY v. STATE
- Austin American-Statesman Archives
- Texas Department of Criminal Justice Records
