Aruba is supposed to be paradise – crystal clear waters, white sand beaches, and the kind of tropical beauty that makes you forget your troubles back home. For the DeVries family in May 2004, it was meant to be a healing getaway, a chance to bond and begin moving forward after an unimaginable loss. Instead, their vacation became every parent's worst nightmare, and twenty years later, the questions surrounding 14-year-old Max DeVries' disappearance continue to haunt everyone who hears his story.
What makes Max's case so infuriating isn't just that a child vanished without a trace – it's that the warning signs were there, the red flags were flying, and somehow, the people responsible walked away free. This isn't a story about a tragic accident or a child who wandered off. This is a story about predators who targeted a vulnerable family, executed a plan with chilling precision, and escaped justice because the system failed at every critical moment.
A Family Trying to Heal
To understand the horror of what happened to Max DeVries, you first need to understand the vulnerability of his family when they arrived in Aruba. Just two years earlier, Yvonne DeVries had lost her husband to a sudden heart attack, leaving her to raise 14-year-old Max and 12-year-old Dominique alone. The trip to Aruba wasn't just a vacation – it was an attempt to create new memories, to find moments of joy amid the grief that had consumed their lives.
Max was a water-loving kid who had grown up around sailboats and absolutely adored being on the ocean. For a boy dealing with the loss of his father, the promise of jet skiing and water sports in paradise must have seemed like the perfect escape. His mother Yvonne was doing her best to give her children some normalcy, some happiness, after their world had been turned upside down.
They stayed at La Cabana resort, looking forward to quality time together beside the beautiful blue ocean. It should have been a chance for healing. Instead, it became the setting for a crime that would destroy what remained of their family.
The Approach
A few days into their stay, Max was playing pool at the resort when a man in his thirties approached him. We know his first name was David – let's call him David Jr. for clarity. He struck up a conversation and began playing pool with the teenager, which initially gave Yvonne some pause. But as any parent who's traveled knows, people on vacation tend to be friendlier, more open to casual interactions. She wrote it off as harmless vacation socializing.
David Jr. soon revealed that he was there with his adoptive father, David Sr., celebrating his adoption anniversary. It was a story designed to evoke sympathy, to present them as a loving family unit rather than potential threats. When David Sr. joined the group, he smoothly inserted himself into the conversation, asking what the DeVries family had planned for the next day.
When Yvonne mentioned they were going parasailing, David Sr. asked if he and his son could join them. It seemed like a reasonable request from fellow vacationers, and Yvonne agreed. Looking back, this was the moment the trap was set.
Building Trust
The parasailing day went perfectly – exactly as the Davids intended. Everyone had fun, and at one point, Max went jet skiing with David Jr. It was a calculated move to build trust, to establish a pattern of safe, enjoyable activities. By the end of the day, when both families parted ways with no immediate plans to meet again, the DeVries family had been successfully assessed and targeted.
The Davids now knew Max's schedule, his interests, his relationship with his mother, and most importantly, they'd established themselves as safe, friendly fellow tourists. The groundwork had been laid for what would come next.
The Setup
The following day, David Sr. approached the DeVries family at the resort pool with what seemed like a casual request: would Max like to go jet skiing again? Yvonne's initial instinct was to say no, but David Sr. was persistent, and Max was eager. After some pleading from her son, she gave in.
This is where the predatory psychology becomes crystal clear. David Sr. had correctly identified that Yvonne, as a single mother trying to give her children joy after their father's death, would be susceptible to pressure when her son expressed enthusiasm. He exploited her desire to see Max happy, using her love for her child as a weapon against her better judgment.
Max and David Sr. rode off on a jet ski while Yvonne and Dominique watched and waved goodbye. It was the last time Max DeVries was ever seen alive.
When Everything Went Wrong
The jet skis were rented for only 45 minutes, so when an hour passed with no sign of Max, Yvonne knew something was wrong. She returned to the beach to find that members of the jet ski rental company were already searching the horizon with binoculars – they were concerned too.
Panicking, Yvonne rushed back to the resort to report that her son was missing and that he had last been seen with a man named David who was also staying at the hotel. When management went to the Davids' room and knocked, there was no answer. Authorities were called, and a search and rescue boat went out looking for Max and David Sr.
Yvonne's worst fears were confirmed when she saw the rescue boat returning with only one person aboard – David Sr. But there was another disturbing detail: David Jr. was nowhere to be found either. He only "casually showed up on the beach" as his father's rescue boat returned, claiming he'd been sleeping off some drinks in his room and hadn't heard the knocking.
The timing of David Jr.'s reappearance is damning. If he was truly asleep and uninvolved, why did he emerge at the exact moment his father was being rescued? The coordination suggests they were in communication throughout the ordeal.
A Story Full of Holes
When David Sr. finally made it to shore, he was covered in scratches on his neck, arms, and face. His explanation for Max's disappearance was immediately suspicious and continued to change throughout questioning.
Initially, he claimed that he and Max had taken their jet skis to a sandbar to explore. When they tried to leave, the jet skis wouldn't start. According to David Sr., Max decided to tie the two jet skis together so they wouldn't float away. He then claimed to have heard a "loud thump," and when he looked over, Max was floating away on one of the dead jet skis.
But under questioning by Aruban police, his story began to shift. At one point, he claimed Max had let go of the jet skis and started swimming to shore. Then he changed it again, saying the last time he saw Max, the boy was "calmly floating away on a jet ski without showing any concern for his predicament." He claimed he tried to call out to Max, but that Max wouldn't respond despite being "awake and alert."
These aren't the kinds of details someone forgets or misremembers about a traumatic event. These are the inconsistencies of someone trying to craft a believable lie while under pressure.
A System That Failed
Here's where the case becomes truly infuriating. Faced with a missing child, a suspect covered in scratches, and a story that changed with each telling, what did the Aruban authorities do?
Absolutely nothing.
When Yvonne asked them to check under David Sr.'s fingernails for DNA evidence – a standard procedure that could have provided crucial forensic evidence – they declined. When she requested a polygraph test, they refused that too. Instead, they simply let David Sr. go.
An extensive air and ocean search was conducted, but Max was never found. The Aruban police issued a statement declaring that Max DeVries was "lost at sea" and was the victim of a "tragic accident." The search was terminated, and the case was effectively closed.
The system had multiple opportunities to properly investigate what was clearly a suspicious disappearance, and it failed at every single one.
The Flight Home Horror
Perhaps the most chilling detail of all came during the flight home. David Sr. and David Jr. were seated directly behind Yvonne and Dominique – a "coincidence" that speaks to either incredible callousness or deliberate psychological torture.
At the end of the flight, David Sr. had the audacity to ask Yvonne if he could send her flowers on the anniversary of Max's disappearance. It was a grotesque gesture that served no purpose other than to maintain contact with his victim's family, perhaps to monitor whether they would continue pursuing the case.
This was the last time Yvonne saw either David, but it wouldn't be the last time they would haunt her life.
Fighting for Justice Alone
Back home, Yvonne tried desperately to gain media attention for her son's disappearance. Unfortunately, Max's case was overshadowed by another tragic disappearance in Aruba – Natalee Holloway vanished there just a year later, and her case captured international attention in a way that Max's never did.
It took a local Michigan police detective to recognize that something terrible had happened to Max. This detective, working on his own time and initiative, quickly concluded that Max's disappearance was no accident. When he ran a background check on David Sr., the results were horrifying but not surprising.
David Sr. had been arrested in 1981 for sexually abusing his adoptive son, David Jr., who was fourteen at the time – the exact same age as Max when he disappeared. This revelation cast the entire "adoption anniversary celebration" story in a sinister new light. Why would a victim of sexual abuse vacation with his abuser to celebrate their relationship?
The Web of Lies Unravels
The detective's investigation revealed that David Jr. had lied to Aruban police, claiming his father had never been arrested when he was personally a victim of David Sr.'s documented crimes. This wasn't a simple oversight or forgotten detail – it was a deliberate deception designed to hide David Sr.'s history of child abuse.
The detective was able to get the FBI briefly involved in the case. They brought David Jr. in for questioning, during which he denied any foul play and maintained that Max was the victim of a tragic accident. When the FBI offered him a polygraph test, he agreed to take it the following day but never returned.
His failure to submit to the polygraph test speaks volumes. An innocent person with nothing to hide doesn't agree to a lie detector test and then flee rather than take it.
Unfortunately, the FBI was soon pulled off the case to work on what they considered a "bigger" investigation, leaving Max's case to go cold once again.
The Detective's Theory
Based on his investigation, the detective developed a theory that makes chilling sense: David Sr. and David Jr. were working together to target young boys. David Jr., as someone closer to the victims' age, was used to groom children and build trust. In Max's case, the detective believes that when Max and David Sr. reached the sandbar, David Jr. met up with them.
Both Davids then sexually abused Max before murdering him and disposing of his body in the ocean. The scratches on David Sr.'s body weren't from climbing back onto a jet ski – they were defensive wounds from a boy fighting for his life.
This theory explains every suspicious detail: David Jr.'s mysterious disappearance and convenient reappearance, the coordination between the two men, David Sr.'s changing story, their history of abuse, and their desperate attempts to avoid any real investigation.
Voices from the Shadows
For twelve years, the case remained cold. Then, in April 2016, Yvonne received a Facebook message that would reignite her hope for justice. A woman who wanted to remain anonymous for safety reasons reached out because she had dated David Jr. for a year and had something important to share.
The woman recounted a disturbing incident when she, David Jr., and David Sr. were relaxing together. David Sr. suddenly asked her: "Has he ever mentioned anything about the fourteen-year-old boy who went missing in Aruba?" When she expressed confusion, David Sr. explained that David Jr. was "very close" to Max and that his disappearance had "hurt him a lot."
When the woman later asked David Jr. about what happened in Aruba, his reaction was explosive. He became extremely angry and demanded she never mention Max again. This wasn't the response of someone dealing with the grief of a tragic accident – it was the reaction of someone trying to bury a secret.
The woman also noticed how David Sr. behaved around her young son from a previous relationship. He got inappropriately close to the child and would often ask the boy to sit on his lap. Recognizing the warning signs, she ended the relationship and later connected the dots to Max's disappearance.
More Disturbing Revelations
Around the same time, Yvonne connected with another woman who had dated David Jr. Her revelations were even more disturbing. This woman revealed that David Jr. had once told her the only good thing his father had ever done for him was "get him out of trouble in Aruba."
This statement is essentially a confession. What kind of "trouble" would a person need to be gotten out of regarding a missing child, other than being responsible for that child's disappearance?
Even more chilling, this woman reported that David Jr. would often say Max's name in his sleep. When she finally worked up the courage to ask him who Max was, David Jr. flew into a rage, held her at gunpoint, and then strangled and stabbed her.
Miraculously, the woman survived this attempted murder. Shockingly, David Jr. served only two years of probation for trying to kill her. The justice system failed again, allowing a dangerous predator to remain free despite clear evidence of his violent tendencies.
Twenty Years of Injustice
Today, twenty years after Max DeVries disappeared into the waters off Aruba, his case remains officially unsolved. Neither David Sr. nor David Jr. has ever been charged in connection with his disappearance, despite overwhelming evidence of their involvement.
The case represents a perfect storm of systemic failures: Aruban authorities who refused to properly investigate, federal agencies that abandoned the case, and a justice system that gave a would-be murderer probation instead of prison time.
Max's story is overshadowed by other high-profile disappearances, but it deserves just as much attention and outrage. A 14-year-old boy was targeted, abused, and murdered by predators who walked free because the people meant to protect him failed at every level.
The Ongoing Pain
For Yvonne DeVries, every day for the past twenty years has been a day without her son and without justice. She went to Aruba as a grieving widow trying to heal her family and returned as a mother whose child had been stolen from her. The trauma of losing Max was compounded by the knowledge that his killers were living freely, potentially targeting other children.
Dominique DeVries, who was just twelve when she watched her brother ride away with David Sr., has lived her entire adult life knowing that the men who destroyed her family face no consequences for their actions.
The ripple effects of this injustice extend beyond the DeVries family. Every day that David Sr. and David Jr. remain free is another day they could target another vulnerable child, another family dealing with loss and grief.
Questions That Demand Answers
Max DeVries' case raises uncomfortable questions about how we protect children and pursue justice. How do two men with a documented history of child abuse get to walk away from a child's disappearance without facing charges? How does someone attempt murder and receive only probation? How does a case with this much evidence remain officially unsolved?
The answers reveal systemic failures at every level. International jurisdictional complications, overworked law enforcement agencies, and a justice system that often fails victims of sexual violence all contributed to this travesty.
But perhaps the most important question is this: How many other children have suffered because these predators remained free?
A Call for Justice
Max DeVries would be 34 years old today if he had lived. He might have had a family of his own, a career he loved, and decades of memories with his mother and sister. Instead, his life was cut short by predators who saw a vulnerable child and an opportunity.
His case deserves to be reopened with fresh eyes and modern investigative techniques. David Sr. and David Jr. deserve to face the consequences of their actions, both for Max's sake and to prevent future victims.
Most importantly, Max DeVries deserves to be remembered not just as a missing child, but as a boy who loved the water, who was trying to heal from his father's death, and who trusted the wrong people at the wrong time.
Sources